• GEJO 01 containerlediging (container emptying system / appareil de vidage de conteneurs), ontworpen voor het efficiënt en veilig legen van containers in industriële toepassingen

    GEJO 01 FLEX Catcher

    The leading Kinshofer KM 920-12 alternative — built for maximum uptime.

    Proven up to 30% lower maintenance costs in heavy-duty usage.

    ✔️ Built for the longest service life in its class.
    ✔️ Enclosed heavy duty frame construction.
    ✔️ Smoother, faster handeling operations
    ✔️ Trusted by all major operators across Europe.

GEJO 01 containerlediging (container emptying system / appareil de vidage de conteneurs)

Why Operators Look for an Alternative to Kinshofer

Industrial container emptying puts equipment under constant stress. If equipment can’t keep up, the impact is immediate — on uptime, safety and daily productivity.

Common issues operators report

  • Unplanned downtime during intensive daily rounds, causing schedule disruptions and overtime
  • Higher maintenance spend due to wear on seals, Hydraulics components needing frequent attention
  • Slower operation, reducing throughput per shift and daily productivity
  • Unpredictable service windows, complicating planning for fleets and municipalities

What this costs your operation

Every unexpected stop means missed collections, extra kilometres and pressure on teams. Over a month, that adds up to real money — and a lower return on your equipment.

See how GEJO 01 Flex compares on hydraulics, construction, lifecycle and maintenance.

GEJO 01 containerlediging (container emptying system / appareil de vidage de conteneurs), ontworpen voor het efficiënt en veilig legen van containers in industriële toepassingen

The Proven Kinshofer Alternative

Built for intensive, daily container emptying. See exactly where
GEJO 01 Flex outperforms the traditional Kinshofer KM 920 Series.

Kinshofer vs. Gusella Bakker
Side‑by‑Side

Criteria Kinshofer
KM 920-12
Gusella Bakker GEJO 01 Flex
Load Capacity 2500 Kg 5000 Kg
System weight 210 Kg 170 Kg (19% Less)
Uptime Higher downtime due to design complexity Up to 30% less downtime due to easy system access
Maintenance More frequent wear on valves, seals and sensors Lower lifetime maintenance costs due to enclosed design
Comparison
of operations
Vertiacal pressure engagement Controlled side engagement
Construction Standard frame with external component Enclosed reinforced heavy‑duty frame
Service life Average lifespan Longest service life in its class
Discharge
movements
Basic cycle times High cycle counts
Hydraulic
system
Complex Hydraulics Hydraulic system protected inside the enclosed design.

Full comparison covers: Hydraulics • Construction • Lifecycle • Maintenance costs • Container discharge efficiency

Meet our trusted partners

SITA
Remondis
SITA
Paprec Auvergne
SITA
Veolia